Virtus.pro Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

12

15

2

-3

57

1:0

3

0

5.4

-23%

12

16

4

-4

49

2:2

2

1

5.4

-15%

10

17

2

-7

46

2:2

1

1

5.3

-29%

9

19

5

-10

79

2:6

1

0

4.9

-25%

9

18

2

-9

50

2:5

3

0

4.4

-39%

Total

52

85

15

-33

280

9:15

10

2

5.1

-26%

Apeks Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

10

4

+10

89

3:2

6

0

7.1

+21%

20

13

3

+7

87

3:2

6

0

6.8

+26%

14

6

4

+8

58

4:0

3

0

6.3

+8%

15

12

5

+3

75

2:2

3

0

6.1

+7%

16

11

2

+5

70

3:3

4

0

6.0

+11%

Total

85

52

18

+33

380

15:9

22

0

6.5

+15%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of Virtus.pro vs Apeks by the Bo3.gg Team

Apeks on Inferno Analysis

Apeks demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for Apeks on Inferno were jkaem, who contributed 20 kills, and STYKO, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9118 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, Apeks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Virtus.pro on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for Virtus.pro, as they managed to secure 8 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Virtus.pro on Inferno included Jame, who contributed 12 kills, and Qikert, who added 12 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6731 total damage, Virtus.pro couldn't prevent Apeks from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, Virtus.pro struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date