0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Speed Round (sec)
00:25s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:28s01:55s
Player score (round)
34721010
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
42271010
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
53%
Nuke
44%
Dust II
31%
Mirage
24%
Vertigo
5%
Ancient
4%
Anubis
3%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
8
Nuke
13%
8
3
Dust II
25%
4
0
Mirage
45%
11
1
Vertigo
43%
14
0
Ancient
33%
3
7
Anubis
61%
23
0
Last 5 maps
Inferno
53%
17
13
Nuke
57%
53
1
Dust II
56%
16
8
Mirage
69%
35
9
Vertigo
38%
8
28
Ancient
37%
38
17
Anubis
58%
43
10
Info
Match analysis of V1dar vs ECLOT by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between V1dar and ECLOT, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by ECLOT. The MVP of this match was Blytz.
ECLOT analytics
The team ECLOT secured 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ECLOT were Blytz contributed 23 kills and Dytor contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 8809 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ECLOT held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
V1dar analytics
The team V1dar managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for V1dar were torox- contributed 19 kills and Alv contributed 18 kills. 8145 of total damage by V1dar could not prevent ECLOT from securing the victory
On the defensive side, V1dar struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments