0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.82
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.52
Player score (round)
37131012
Shots (total/round)
11516
Player score (round)
35781012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Molotov damage (total/round)
8923.8
Molotov damage (total/round)
11423.8
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
67%
Dust II
44%
Inferno
43%
Overpass
43%
Vertigo
33%
Nuke
33%
Mirage
23%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
4
Dust II
0%
0
3
Inferno
0%
4
1
Overpass
0%
0
2
Vertigo
100%
1
0
Nuke
0%
1
1
Mirage
50%
2
1
Last 5 maps
Ancient
67%
12
12
Dust II
44%
9
21
Inferno
43%
28
5
Overpass
43%
21
8
Vertigo
67%
6
19
Nuke
33%
12
31
Mirage
73%
15
11
Info
Match analysis of UYU vs ATK by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between UYU and ATK, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by ATK. The MVP of this match was motm.
ATK analytics
The team ATK secured 16 out of 28 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ATK were motm contributed 29 kills and Swisher contributed 26 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 10628 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ATK held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
UYU analytics
The team UYU managed to secure 12 out of 28 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for UYU were tatm contributed 19 kills and Alvin contributed 22 kills. 8888 of total damage by UYU could not prevent ATK from securing the victory
On the defensive side, UYU struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments