0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
114.5517
Trades on a map
10.083.4876
Assists on a map
94.3808
Kills on a map
25.9217.3379
Damage (avg/round)
137.11915.9
Trades on a map
7.923.4876
Speed Round (sec)
00:19s01:54s
Speed Round (sec)
00:33s01:54s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
70%
Overpass
54%
Nuke
18%
Anubis
16%
Ancient
5%
Mirage
3%
Inferno
2%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
70%
10
10
Overpass
54%
13
9
Nuke
68%
25
2
Anubis
43%
14
12
Ancient
50%
2
33
Mirage
44%
16
9
Inferno
38%
13
6
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
2
6
Overpass
0%
2
9
Nuke
50%
6
15
Anubis
59%
17
1
Ancient
55%
22
1
Mirage
47%
15
1
Inferno
40%
5
16
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of TYLOO vs GR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between TYLOO and GR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by GR. The MVP of this match was Reminder.
GR analytics
The team GR secured 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GR were Reminder contributed 26 kills and qqGOD contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 6965 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
TYLOO analytics
The team TYLOO managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for TYLOO were JamYoung contributed 15 kills and lyr1cs contributed 12 kills. 5715 of total damage by TYLOO could not prevent GR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, TYLOO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments