TYLOO Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

16

4

+2

84

4:3

3

0

6.5

0%

16

16

2

0

72

2:4

4

1

6.4

+6%

14

13

3

+1

59

0:3

4

1

5.8

-8%

9

15

3

-6

47

1:0

1

0

5.0

-28%

9

14

3

-5

43

3:3

2

0

4.7

-10%

Total

66

74

15

-8

306

10:13

14

2

5.7

-8%

G2 Scoreboard Inferno (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

20

13

3

+7

90

10:1

4

1

8.1

+5%

13

12

5

+1

69

1:2

4

2

6.0

-5%

16

14

3

+2

69

0:1

5

0

5.8

+6%

12

15

7

-3

67

2:2

3

0

5.6

+4%

12

12

4

0

58

0:4

2

0

5.0

-5%

Total

73

66

22

+7

353

13:10

18

3

6.1

+1%

Teams advantage Inferno (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of TYLOO vs G2 by the Bo3.gg Team

G2 on Inferno Analysis

G2 demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 23 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for G2 on Inferno were m0NESY, who contributed 20 kills, and NiKo, who added 13 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8120 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, G2 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


TYLOO on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for TYLOO, as they managed to secure 10 out of 23 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for TYLOO on Inferno included JamYoung, who contributed 18 kills, and zede, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7028 total damage, TYLOO couldn't prevent G2 from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, TYLOO struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments2
By date