0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
6.12
Openning kills on a map
8.052.8849
Eco wins full buy
1
Shots (total/round)
8516
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
38321011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
100%
Overpass
86%
Nuke
78%
Ancient
64%
Anubis
58%
Inferno
55%
Vertigo
50%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
1
0
Overpass
0%
1
0
Nuke
0%
1
1
Ancient
0%
0
2
Anubis
0%
0
0
Inferno
0%
0
1
Vertigo
100%
2
0
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
50
Overpass
86%
14
17
Nuke
78%
27
5
Ancient
64%
22
10
Anubis
58%
24
10
Inferno
55%
11
17
Vertigo
50%
18
0
Info
Match analysis of System5 vs SAW by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between System5 and SAW, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Overpass, Nuke, Vertigo, and victory was secured by SAW. The MVP of this match was ewjerkz.
SAW analytics
The team SAW secured 31 out of 63 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Overpass, Nuke. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SAW were ewjerkz contributed 47 kills and arrozdoce contributed 41 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 23950 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
System5 analytics
The team System5 managed to secure 32 out of 63 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for System5 were P4TriCK contributed 45 kills and Chill contributed 43 kills. 22801 of total damage by System5 could not prevent SAW from securing the victory
On the defensive side, System5 struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 20 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments