0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
113.4
Damage (total/round)
39673
Player score (round)
39401012
Damage (total/round)
39073
Shots (total/round)
8416
Player score (round)
40011012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
59%
Mirage
55%
Nuke
35%
Vertigo
32%
Ancient
23%
Inferno
11%
Dust II
4%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
14%
7
25
Mirage
55%
11
14
Nuke
33%
18
21
Vertigo
35%
20
5
Ancient
46%
13
15
Inferno
65%
43
0
Dust II
46%
39
0
Last 5 maps
Overpass
73%
11
8
Mirage
0%
0
18
Nuke
68%
19
1
Vertigo
67%
6
12
Ancient
69%
13
5
Inferno
54%
13
5
Dust II
42%
12
3
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of SWS vs ARCTIC by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SWS and ARCTIC, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Vertigo, Ancient, and victory was secured by ARCTIC. The MVP of this match was short.
ARCTIC analytics
The team ARCTIC secured 32 out of 55 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Ancient. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for ARCTIC were short contributed 46 kills and piriajr contributed 48 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 22051 overall damage.
On the defensive side, ARCTIC held their ground firmly, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SWS analytics
The team SWS managed to secure 23 out of 55 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SWS were gbb contributed 38 kills and bsd contributed 35 kills. 18111 of total damage by SWS could not prevent ARCTIC from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SWS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments