Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP damage (avg/round)
274.6
USP damage (avg/round)
474.6
Percentage of headshots
44%15%
HE damage (avg/round)
42.53.4
AK47 kills on a map
26.732
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4398
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
1913.8
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
163.8
Flash duration on a map (sec)
00:07s00:39s
Smoke thrown on a map
215.0371
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
66%
Inferno
55%
Overpass
53%
Vertigo
46%
Ancient
44%
Nuke
33%
Mirage
11%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
3
Inferno
0%
0
3
Overpass
0%
1
0
Vertigo
100%
1
2
Ancient
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
0
0
Mirage
83%
6
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
66%
29
7
Inferno
55%
33
4
Overpass
53%
17
16
Vertigo
54%
28
10
Ancient
44%
16
34
Nuke
33%
3
54
Mirage
72%
50
2
Info
Match analysis of Sweden vs BLUEJAYS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sweden and BLUEJAYS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Mirage, and victory was secured by BLUEJAYS. The MVP of this match was CacaNito.
BLUEJAYS analytics
The team BLUEJAYS secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BLUEJAYS were CacaNito contributed 5 kills and stYleEeZ contributed 4 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 989 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BLUEJAYS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sweden analytics
The team Sweden managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sweden were Peppzor contributed 1 kills and maxster contributed 0 kills. 355 of total damage by Sweden could not prevent BLUEJAYS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sweden struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments