Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Smoke thrown on a map
3615.0373
Galil damage (avg/round)
16.35.6
Smoke thrown on a map
3015.0373
Damage (total/round)
49273
Player score (round)
34871012
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
73%
Inferno
63%
Mirage
57%
Ancient
38%
Anubis
25%
Nuke
24%
Overpass
8%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
0%
5
3
Inferno
0%
0
25
Mirage
57%
14
5
Ancient
25%
8
7
Anubis
78%
9
3
Nuke
33%
12
5
Overpass
67%
6
8
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
73%
26
0
Inferno
63%
16
18
Mirage
0%
0
48
Ancient
63%
27
7
Anubis
53%
17
2
Nuke
57%
30
3
Overpass
59%
17
26
Info
Match analysis of Spirit vs SAW by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Spirit and SAW, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Anubis, Ancient, Nuke, and victory was secured by Spirit. The MVP of this match was donk.
Spirit analytics
The team Spirit secured 49 out of 94 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Nuke. They also successfully set 10 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Spirit were donk contributed 82 kills and ArtFr0st contributed 65 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 34412 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Spirit held their ground firmly, successfully defending 25 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SAW analytics
The team SAW managed to secure 45 out of 94 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 13 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SAW were ewjerkz contributed 64 kills and MUTiRiS contributed 62 kills. 33883 of total damage by SAW could not prevent Spirit from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SAW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 23 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments