0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
15.32.1
Smoke thrown on a map
1814.5022
Tec-9 kills on a map
31.3014
Tec-9 damage (avg/round)
10.83.6
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4482
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
13.54.1
Clutch (opponents)
2
Teammate kills
1
Molotov damage (total/round)
28823.7
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:19s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
62%
Anubis
20%
Vertigo
18%
Ancient
13%
Inferno
11%
Dust II
9%
Mirage
3%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
49
Anubis
50%
38
7
Vertigo
53%
19
8
Ancient
50%
36
10
Inferno
53%
30
11
Dust II
41%
17
16
Mirage
48%
25
12
Last 5 maps
Nuke
62%
29
28
Anubis
70%
37
7
Vertigo
71%
38
1
Ancient
63%
27
9
Inferno
64%
14
21
Dust II
50%
2
27
Mirage
45%
20
35
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Solid vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Solid and MIBR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was drop.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 13 out of 19 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were drop contributed 19 kills and insani contributed 17 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7595 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Solid analytics
The team Solid managed to secure 6 out of 19 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Solid were drg contributed 13 kills and ALLE contributed 13 kills. 6181 of total damage by Solid could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Solid struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments