0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:32s01:26s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:26s
HE damage (avg/round)
11.23.4
AK47 kills on a map
126.5888
AK47 damage (avg/round)
63.925.3
Galil kills on a map
51.8171
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
4729
Smoke thrown on a map
1814.6931
AK47 damage (avg/round)
65.825.3
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
62%
Overpass
44%
Ancient
42%
Vertigo
27%
Mirage
20%
Anubis
2%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
54
Overpass
44%
9
21
Ancient
38%
29
15
Vertigo
29%
14
5
Mirage
50%
22
8
Anubis
55%
20
6
Inferno
67%
18
16
Last 5 maps
Nuke
62%
13
10
Overpass
0%
0
39
Ancient
80%
20
5
Vertigo
56%
16
9
Mirage
70%
10
13
Anubis
53%
15
14
Inferno
67%
9
13
Info
Match analysis of Solid vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Solid and MIBR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Ancient, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was insani.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were insani contributed 17 kills and exit contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7351 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Solid analytics
The team Solid managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Solid were gbb contributed 11 kills and CSO contributed 9 kills. 4622 of total damage by Solid could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Solid struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments