0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
Assists on a map
84.4098
Trades on a map
7.043.4638
Player score (round)
37761011
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Knife kills
11
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
74%
Ancient
38%
Vertigo
32%
Mirage
23%
Inferno
17%
Overpass
17%
Anubis
1%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
55
Ancient
38%
29
14
Vertigo
31%
16
5
Mirage
50%
22
8
Inferno
63%
19
16
Overpass
50%
10
22
Anubis
55%
20
7
Last 5 maps
Nuke
74%
23
17
Ancient
0%
2
67
Vertigo
63%
16
24
Mirage
73%
30
5
Inferno
80%
15
26
Overpass
67%
12
20
Anubis
56%
27
12
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Solid vs Imperial by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Solid and Imperial, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Imperial. The MVP of this match was felps.
Imperial analytics
The team Imperial secured 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Imperial were felps contributed 15 kills and VINI contributed 16 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7098 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Imperial held their ground firmly, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Solid analytics
The team Solid managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Solid were ALLE contributed 10 kills and xureba contributed 7 kills. 4857 of total damage by Solid could not prevent Imperial from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Solid struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments