Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:35s01:27s
M4A1 kills on a map
114.5517
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
50.616.3
USP damage (avg/round)
13.64.7
Galil kills on a map
41.8161
HE damage (avg/round)
12.33.4
Player score (round)
37801011
Clutch (opponents)
3
Knife kills
11
HE damage (total/round)
16726.5
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
67%
Mirage
35%
Inferno
30%
Ancient
29%
Overpass
15%
Vertigo
8%
Anubis
1%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
67%
15
9
Mirage
85%
13
5
Inferno
75%
8
15
Ancient
0%
3
36
Overpass
40%
10
11
Vertigo
56%
9
8
Anubis
60%
20
5
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
3
37
Mirage
50%
20
9
Inferno
45%
11
14
Ancient
29%
14
16
Overpass
55%
11
6
Vertigo
64%
11
3
Anubis
59%
17
2
Info
Match analysis of Imperial vs Solid by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Imperial and Solid, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Anubis, Vertigo, Mirage, and victory was secured by Imperial. The MVP of this match was felps.
Imperial analytics
The team Imperial secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Vertigo. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Imperial were felps contributed 60 kills and noway contributed 51 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 27700 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Imperial held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Solid analytics
The team Solid managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Solid were CSO contributed 59 kills and xureba contributed 52 kills. 27921 of total damage by Solid could not prevent Imperial from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Solid struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments