Ended
Full stats

0 Comments

SINNERS Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

24

12

3

+12

89

4:2

7

2

7.8

+25%

20

16

4

+4

81

6:0

4

0

7.1

+4%

19

17

7

+2

89

6:2

7

1

7.1

+7%

17

15

5

+2

63

1:1

3

0

5.8

-4%

12

18

5

-6

66

2:1

1

1

5.3

-10%

Total

92

78

24

+14

388

19:6

22

4

6.6

+4%

RUBIK Scoreboard Inferno (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

22

14

2

+8

74

0:1

4

0

6.8

+32%

19

19

4

0

95

1:5

7

1

6.6

+1%

16

18

8

-2

79

1:4

5

1

5.9

-11%

12

20

3

-8

48

2:6

3

0

4.7

-25%

8

21

3

-13

51

2:3

0

0

4.4

-39%

Total

77

92

20

-15

347

6:19

19

2

5.7

-9%

Teams advantage Inferno (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of SINNERS vs RUBIK by the Bo3.gg Team

SINNERS on Inferno Analysis

SINNERS demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 16 out of 25 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for SINNERS on Inferno were ZEDKO, who contributed 24 kills, and oskar, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 9700 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, SINNERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


RUBIK on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for RUBIK, as they managed to secure 9 out of 25 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for RUBIK on Inferno included coolio, who contributed 22 kills, and Kamion, who added 19 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8668 total damage, RUBIK couldn't prevent SINNERS from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, RUBIK struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date