Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Smoke thrown on a map
2315.0373
Trades on a map
113.5088
Player score (round)
41861012
Player score (round)
37751012
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Zeus kills
1
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:22s00:05s
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
71%
Inferno
67%
Vertigo
60%
Ancient
59%
Mirage
57%
Anubis
50%
Nuke
43%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
71%
38
3
Inferno
67%
3
47
Vertigo
60%
35
5
Ancient
59%
22
13
Mirage
43%
14
21
Anubis
50%
18
17
Nuke
43%
23
16
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
2
0
Inferno
0%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Ancient
0%
1
0
Mirage
100%
1
0
Anubis
0%
0
1
Nuke
0%
0
1
Info
Match analysis of SINNERS vs RUBIK by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SINNERS and RUBIK, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Inferno, Overpass, and victory was secured by SINNERS. The MVP of this match was oskar.
SINNERS analytics
The team SINNERS secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Overpass. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SINNERS were oskar contributed 42 kills and ZEDKO contributed 44 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19542 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SINNERS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
RUBIK analytics
The team RUBIK managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for RUBIK were Kamion contributed 41 kills and coolio contributed 36 kills. 17215 of total damage by RUBIK could not prevent SINNERS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, RUBIK struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments