Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.82
Damage (total/round)
43073
Player score (round)
59411012
Player score (round)
36191012
Shots (total/round)
10016
Player score (round)
44901012
Player's aces
1
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
3
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
39%
Dust II
38%
Overpass
36%
Vertigo
25%
Nuke
20%
Mirage
20%
Inferno
3%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
56%
9
5
Dust II
71%
7
5
Overpass
50%
2
21
Vertigo
50%
8
1
Nuke
33%
6
6
Mirage
43%
7
11
Inferno
78%
9
10
Last 5 maps
Ancient
17%
6
5
Dust II
33%
9
2
Overpass
14%
7
11
Vertigo
25%
4
16
Nuke
53%
17
0
Mirage
63%
8
4
Inferno
75%
4
11
Info
Match analysis of Sharks vs SWS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sharks and SWS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Mirage, Ancient, and victory was secured by Sharks. The MVP of this match was pancc.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks secured 32 out of 49 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Ancient. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sharks were pancc contributed 51 kills and jnt contributed 40 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19987 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 21 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SWS analytics
The team SWS managed to secure 17 out of 49 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SWS were matios contributed 32 kills and chay contributed 29 kills. 14804 of total damage by SWS could not prevent Sharks from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SWS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 9 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments