Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Smoke thrown on a map
2315.0371
M4A1 kills on a map
154.6963
USP kills on a map
41.616
Molotov damage (avg/round)
11.52
HE damage (avg/round)
13.23.4
Shots (total/round)
10216
Player score (round)
37441012
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
34%
Mirage
23%
Nuke
20%
Overpass
12%
Ancient
11%
Dust II
4%
Vertigo
3%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
65%
20
19
Mirage
63%
19
11
Nuke
50%
20
11
Overpass
50%
2
49
Ancient
53%
19
13
Dust II
53%
15
12
Vertigo
53%
19
3
Last 5 maps
Inferno
31%
13
15
Mirage
40%
15
11
Nuke
30%
10
20
Overpass
38%
8
7
Ancient
42%
12
3
Dust II
57%
7
10
Vertigo
50%
10
7
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Sharks vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sharks and MIBR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 3-0, on the following maps: Ancient, Inferno, and victory was secured by Sharks. The MVP of this match was zevy.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks secured 32 out of 53 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Inferno. They also successfully set 9 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sharks were zevy contributed 45 kills and Lucaozy contributed 39 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19395 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 21 out of 53 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were chelo contributed 38 kills and exit contributed 35 kills. 18009 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent Sharks from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments