0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4398
AK47 kills on a map
156.732
AK47 damage (avg/round)
68.525.3
AUG kills on a map
82.6098
AUG damage (avg/round)
30.68.1
Damage (total/round)
45873
Player score (round)
40801012
Player score (round)
37751012
Player's aces
1
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
56%
Nuke
35%
Dust II
33%
Ancient
29%
Mirage
24%
Overpass
10%
Vertigo
2%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
73%
11
12
Nuke
60%
15
8
Dust II
58%
12
6
Ancient
58%
12
9
Mirage
62%
13
11
Overpass
50%
2
32
Vertigo
40%
10
2
Last 5 maps
Inferno
17%
6
13
Nuke
25%
4
19
Dust II
25%
4
9
Ancient
29%
7
3
Mirage
38%
16
0
Overpass
60%
5
5
Vertigo
38%
8
3
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Sharks vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sharks and MIBR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Nuke, Mirage, and victory was secured by Sharks. The MVP of this match was pancc.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks secured 32 out of 51 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Mirage. They also successfully set 4 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sharks were pancc contributed 44 kills and zevy contributed 43 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 19724 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 16 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 19 out of 51 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were boltz contributed 32 kills and chelo contributed 31 kills. 16610 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent Sharks from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments