0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:26s01:28s
AUG kills on a map
92.5974
AUG damage (avg/round)
43.48.1
AK47 damage (avg/round)
60.625.4
Damage (total/round)
40973
Damage (total/round)
50073
Player score (round)
37341012
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
34871012
Player's aces
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Overpass
100%
Mirage
26%
Vertigo
13%
Inferno
9%
Nuke
4%
Anubis
4%
Ancient
1%
Last 5 maps
Overpass
0%
0
50
Mirage
47%
17
19
Vertigo
60%
10
15
Inferno
50%
22
16
Nuke
63%
24
3
Anubis
67%
21
4
Ancient
72%
25
1
Last 5 maps
Overpass
100%
5
37
Mirage
73%
15
20
Vertigo
47%
17
2
Inferno
59%
17
11
Nuke
67%
12
10
Anubis
63%
19
0
Ancient
71%
17
11
Info
Match analysis of Sharks vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sharks and MIBR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Anubis, Mirage, Nuke, and victory was secured by Sharks. The MVP of this match was togs.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sharks were togs contributed 49 kills and doc contributed 45 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 22016 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sharks held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for MIBR were saffee contributed 39 kills and brnz4n contributed 42 kills. 22039 of total damage by MIBR could not prevent Sharks from securing the victory
On the defensive side, MIBR struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments