0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
AK47 kills on a map
56.6606
AK47 damage (avg/round)
159.325.3
GLOCK kills on a map
21.4429
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
593.9
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
45.316.3
USP kills on a map
11.6107
USP damage (avg/round)
184.7
Shots accuracy (%)
43%18%
USP damage (avg/round)
164.7
Percentage of headshots
50%15%
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
47%
Anubis
31%
Inferno
25%
Vertigo
15%
Ancient
11%
Nuke
6%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
25%
32
34
Anubis
84%
32
1
Inferno
53%
17
15
Vertigo
55%
22
16
Ancient
68%
25
20
Nuke
44%
32
16
Overpass
0%
0
72
Last 5 maps
Mirage
72%
18
7
Anubis
53%
19
11
Inferno
78%
9
13
Vertigo
40%
15
10
Ancient
79%
19
7
Nuke
50%
12
9
Overpass
0%
0
41
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Sharks vs MIBR by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sharks and MIBR, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by MIBR. The MVP of this match was exit.
MIBR analytics
The team MIBR secured 3 out of 3 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for MIBR were exit contributed 7 kills and drop contributed 2 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 1500 overall damage.
On the defensive side, MIBR held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks managed to secure 0 out of 3 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sharks were rdnzao contributed 1 kills and drg contributed 1 kills. 724 of total damage by Sharks could not prevent MIBR from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments