0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Eco wins full buy
1
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
37951012
Player score (round)
35861012
Player score (round)
41511012
Damage (total/round)
40073
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
75%
Vertigo
64%
Nuke
53%
Mirage
28%
Ancient
25%
Inferno
21%
Overpass
0%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
25%
12
7
Vertigo
64%
14
2
Nuke
53%
15
5
Mirage
72%
18
0
Ancient
58%
12
8
Inferno
54%
13
11
Overpass
0%
0
29
Last 5 maps
Dust II
100%
1
3
Vertigo
0%
0
1
Nuke
0%
0
2
Mirage
100%
2
2
Ancient
33%
3
2
Inferno
33%
3
0
Overpass
0%
1
0
Info
Match analysis of Sharks vs Case by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sharks and Case, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Ancient, Dust II, Mirage, and victory was secured by Case. The MVP of this match was RCF.
Case analytics
The team Case secured 45 out of 90 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II, Mirage. They also successfully set 7 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Case were RCF contributed 78 kills and steel contributed 60 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 32698 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Case held their ground firmly, successfully defending 25 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Sharks analytics
The team Sharks managed to secure 45 out of 90 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Sharks were chay contributed 71 kills and Lucaozy contributed 67 kills. 33238 of total damage by Sharks could not prevent Case from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Sharks struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 28 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments