SAW Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

12

6

+6

97

3:0

4

0

7.2

+31%

18

10

6

+8

88

3:3

4

0

7.0

+25%

14

11

5

+3

89

3:1

5

0

6.6

+10%

13

13

4

0

78

2:2

3

0

6.0

+1%

14

11

2

+3

53

2:2

4

0

5.7

-9%

Total

77

57

23

+20

404

13:8

20

0

6.5

+12%

Zero Tenacity Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

13

3

+6

103

2:0

5

1

7.6

+22%

13

17

2

-4

75

0:2

3

0

5.4

-8%

10

14

4

-4

49

2:2

1

0

5.0

-21%

9

16

3

-7

56

3:5

2

0

4.8

-22%

6

17

6

-11

53

1:4

1

0

4.3

-35%

Total

57

77

18

-20

335

8:13

12

1

5.4

-13%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of SAW vs Zero Tenacity by the Bo3.gg Team

SAW on Anubis Analysis

SAW demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for SAW on Anubis were rmn, who contributed 18 kills, and MUTiRiS, who added 18 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8483 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Zero Tenacity on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Zero Tenacity, as they managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Zero Tenacity on Anubis included brutmonster, who contributed 19 kills, and simke, who added 13 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 7035 total damage, Zero Tenacity couldn't prevent SAW from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Zero Tenacity struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date