SAW Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

8

4

+10

104

3:1

6

0

7.9

+39%

16

8

7

+8

104

4:0

4

0

7.8

+29%

14

7

4

+7

95

2:1

3

1

7.5

+35%

11

10

0

+1

55

2:3

4

0

5.4

-7%

8

11

4

-3

63

1:1

1

0

5.4

-10%

Total

67

44

19

+23

421

12:6

18

1

6.8

+17%

TSM Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

16

15

1

+1

74

1:2

5

0

6.3

-6%

8

11

5

-3

43

3:2

2

0

5.4

-25%

9

11

5

-2

62

0:1

2

0

5.3

-11%

7

14

4

-7

56

0:1

2

0

4.8

-28%

4

16

5

-12

42

2:6

1

0

3.9

-47%

Total

44

67

20

-23

277

6:12

12

0

5.2

-23%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of SAW vs TSM by the Bo3.gg Team

SAW on Inferno Analysis

SAW demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for SAW on Inferno were arrozdoce, who contributed 18 kills, and ewjerkz, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 7582 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


TSM on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for TSM, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for TSM on Inferno included Zyphon, who contributed 16 kills, and acoR, who added 8 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 4977 total damage, TSM couldn't prevent SAW from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, TSM struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date