0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Smoke thrown on a map
1914.3232
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4516
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
18.54.2
Galil damage (avg/round)
16.96
USP damage (avg/round)
144.8
Smoke thrown on a map
1814.3232
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
13.84.2
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3011
Headshots on a map
13.940.318
Player score (round)
43451010
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
76%
Ancient
48%
Nuke
35%
Dust II
32%
Inferno
22%
Vertigo
3%
Anubis
3%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
37
Ancient
48%
21
15
Nuke
71%
34
1
Dust II
57%
14
5
Inferno
58%
19
8
Vertigo
63%
16
4
Anubis
47%
19
16
Last 5 maps
Mirage
76%
17
5
Ancient
0%
0
37
Nuke
36%
14
5
Dust II
25%
4
16
Inferno
36%
11
10
Vertigo
60%
10
14
Anubis
50%
16
2
Info
Match analysis of SAW vs Rooster by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SAW and Rooster, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by SAW. The MVP of this match was ewjerkz.
SAW analytics
The team SAW secured 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SAW were ewjerkz contributed 20 kills and MUTiRiS contributed 15 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7421 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Rooster analytics
The team Rooster managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Rooster were asap contributed 10 kills and chelleos contributed 8 kills. 4460 of total damage by Rooster could not prevent SAW from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Rooster struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments