3 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Smoke thrown on a map
2714.6931
HE damage (avg/round)
143.4
Flash duration on a map (sec)
01:43s00:37s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
7729
Shots (total/round)
9316
Player score (round)
40311011
Damage (total/round)
38373
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
71%
Ancient
60%
Nuke
14%
Vertigo
9%
Inferno
3%
Anubis
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
71%
34
6
Ancient
0%
2
74
Nuke
58%
31
20
Vertigo
50%
20
34
Inferno
64%
25
24
Anubis
52%
27
13
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
55
Ancient
60%
20
11
Nuke
72%
32
3
Vertigo
41%
22
1
Inferno
67%
12
21
Anubis
52%
23
13
Info
Match analysis of Imperial vs SAW by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Imperial and SAW, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Nuke, and victory was secured by SAW. The MVP of this match was story.
SAW analytics
The team SAW secured 29 out of 47 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Nuke. They also successfully set 8 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SAW were story contributed 33 kills and rmn contributed 33 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16681 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Imperial analytics
The team Imperial managed to secure 18 out of 47 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 6 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Imperial were felps contributed 30 kills and HEN1 contributed 30 kills. 16767 of total damage by Imperial could not prevent SAW from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Imperial struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
3 Comments