Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Molotov damage (avg/round)
7.72
HE damage (avg/round)
16.33.4
HE damage (avg/round)
17.43.4
Multikill x-
4
Molotov damage (total/round)
15423.8
HE damage (total/round)
13726.8
HE damage (total/round)
24726.8
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:16s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
64%
Dust II
56%
Overpass
38%
Ancient
13%
Inferno
7%
Vertigo
0%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
64%
22
0
Dust II
56%
16
15
Overpass
38%
13
24
Ancient
63%
24
4
Inferno
48%
25
12
Vertigo
50%
20
8
Mirage
0%
0
53
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
3
6
Dust II
0%
6
5
Overpass
0%
2
2
Ancient
50%
10
1
Inferno
55%
11
0
Vertigo
50%
4
0
Mirage
0%
0
4
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of SAW vs GTZ by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SAW and GTZ, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by SAW. The MVP of this match was JUST.
SAW analytics
The team SAW secured 10 out of 12 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SAW were JUST contributed 13 kills and rmn contributed 11 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 5368 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
GTZ analytics
The team GTZ managed to secure 2 out of 12 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for GTZ were StepA contributed 7 kills and ra1se contributed 7 kills. 2978 of total damage by GTZ could not prevent SAW from securing the victory
On the defensive side, GTZ struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments