0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Rounds win streak
103
Smoke thrown on a map
2014.2369
Smoke thrown on a map
2114.2369
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4531
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
12.54.2
Galil damage (avg/round)
17.86
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
12.74.2
Damage (total/round)
39273
Player score (round)
34681010
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
57%
Nuke
33%
Dust II
26%
Ancient
21%
Anubis
12%
Inferno
6%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
30
Nuke
72%
25
1
Dust II
70%
10
8
Ancient
42%
19
11
Anubis
64%
14
8
Inferno
62%
13
8
Last 5 maps
Mirage
57%
28
6
Nuke
39%
18
15
Dust II
44%
9
22
Ancient
63%
16
12
Anubis
52%
23
10
Inferno
56%
16
18
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- wwlll
- llwll
Info
Match analysis of SAW vs GamerLegion by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SAW and GamerLegion, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Nuke, and victory was secured by GamerLegion. The MVP of this match was sl3nd.
GamerLegion analytics
The team GamerLegion secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for GamerLegion were sl3nd contributed 35 kills and ztr contributed 35 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17541 overall damage.
On the defensive side, GamerLegion held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SAW analytics
The team SAW managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SAW were story contributed 36 kills and Ag1L contributed 33 kills. 17141 of total damage by SAW could not prevent GamerLegion from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SAW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments