Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:34s01:27s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:25s01:27s
Player score (round)
34771011
Damage (total/round)
45373
Player score (round)
36351011
Shots (total/round)
8516
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
3
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Vertigo
38%
Anubis
19%
Nuke
17%
Overpass
8%
Ancient
3%
Inferno
1%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
65%
20
0
Anubis
52%
27
8
Nuke
67%
27
3
Overpass
58%
19
16
Ancient
57%
23
12
Inferno
57%
14
18
Mirage
0%
0
52
Last 5 maps
Vertigo
27%
11
7
Anubis
33%
9
14
Nuke
50%
4
11
Overpass
50%
10
6
Ancient
60%
15
1
Inferno
58%
12
6
Mirage
0%
0
23
Info
Match analysis of SAW vs fnatic by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SAW and fnatic, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by SAW. The MVP of this match was MATYS.
SAW analytics
The team SAW secured 16 out of 29 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SAW were arrozdoce contributed 18 kills and story contributed 20 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9759 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
fnatic analytics
The team fnatic managed to secure 13 out of 29 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for fnatic were MATYS contributed 22 kills and kyuubii contributed 19 kills. 9383 of total damage by fnatic could not prevent SAW from securing the victory
On the defensive side, fnatic struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments