0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
M4A1 kills on a map
154.306
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
49.616.3
Smoke thrown on a map
4014.2369
Smoke thrown on a map
3014.2369
Flash duration on a map (sec)
02:18s00:35s
AWP kills on a map
226.2912
AWP damage (avg/round)
60.221.6
Player score (round)
35921010
Player score (round)
35131010
Player score (round)
35831010
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
33%
Inferno
27%
Dust II
23%
Anubis
21%
Ancient
20%
Nuke
15%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
35
Inferno
60%
15
8
Dust II
73%
11
10
Anubis
61%
18
9
Ancient
50%
22
12
Nuke
75%
28
1
Last 5 maps
Mirage
33%
18
5
Inferno
33%
3
21
Dust II
50%
18
0
Anubis
40%
10
22
Ancient
70%
20
1
Nuke
60%
10
11
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of SAW vs BIG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SAW and BIG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Nuke, Ancient, and victory was secured by BIG. The MVP of this match was hyped.
BIG analytics
The team BIG secured 29 out of 45 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke, Ancient. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for BIG were hyped contributed 49 kills and JDC contributed 36 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 17926 overall damage.
On the defensive side, BIG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SAW analytics
The team SAW managed to secure 16 out of 45 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 4 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SAW were rmn contributed 24 kills and Ag1L contributed 25 kills. 13431 of total damage by SAW could not prevent BIG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SAW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 10 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments