0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
USP kills on a map
41.5986
HE damage (avg/round)
21.83.4
Assists on a map
13.924.4746
Player score (round)
37421010
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Molotov damage (total/round)
9523.6
HE damage (total/round)
13926.1
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:15s00:05s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:26s01:24s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
65%
Vertigo
41%
Dust II
16%
Ancient
13%
Inferno
6%
Anubis
6%
Nuke
2%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
37
Vertigo
60%
15
4
Dust II
57%
14
6
Ancient
50%
22
15
Inferno
56%
18
8
Anubis
50%
20
15
Nuke
69%
35
1
Last 5 maps
Mirage
65%
31
3
Vertigo
19%
16
19
Dust II
73%
11
4
Ancient
63%
27
11
Inferno
50%
2
52
Anubis
56%
25
12
Nuke
67%
24
5
Info
Match analysis of SAW vs BetBoom by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SAW and BetBoom, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-1, on the following maps: Ancient, Nuke, Anubis, and victory was secured by SAW. The MVP of this match was story.
SAW analytics
The team SAW secured 36 out of 66 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Ancient, Anubis. They also successfully set 6 bombs during the match.
The standout players for SAW were story contributed 54 kills and MUTiRiS contributed 51 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 25103 overall damage.
On the defensive side, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
BetBoom analytics
The team BetBoom managed to secure 30 out of 66 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for BetBoom were KaiR0N- contributed 57 kills and s1ren contributed 42 kills. 23547 of total damage by BetBoom could not prevent SAW from securing the victory
On the defensive side, BetBoom struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments