0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
HE damage (avg/round)
133.4
HE damage (avg/round)
11.33.4
Assists on a map
15.084.3517
Speed Round (sec)
00:29s01:54s
Shots (total/round)
11116
Shots (total/round)
8316
Damage (total/round)
40673
Player score (round)
48641012
Damage (total/round)
42173
Damage (total/round)
39673
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
47%
Nuke
44%
Overpass
23%
Vertigo
12%
Ancient
10%
Inferno
9%
Dust II
5%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
56
Nuke
71%
31
0
Overpass
23%
13
22
Vertigo
53%
19
15
Ancient
58%
24
5
Inferno
48%
25
14
Dust II
48%
23
16
Last 5 maps
Mirage
47%
17
5
Nuke
27%
15
13
Overpass
0%
0
36
Vertigo
41%
17
2
Ancient
48%
21
4
Inferno
39%
23
13
Dust II
53%
19
5
Info
Match analysis of SAW vs AGO by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SAW and AGO, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Vertigo, Ancient, Nuke, and victory was secured by AGO. The MVP of this match was stadodo.
AGO analytics
The team AGO secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Vertigo, Ancient. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for AGO were leman contributed 65 kills and ultimate contributed 60 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 31695 overall damage.
On the defensive side, AGO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SAW analytics
The team SAW managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SAW were stadodo contributed 60 kills and JUST contributed 61 kills. 30034 of total damage by SAW could not prevent AGO from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SAW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments