Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:33s01:30s
Shots accuracy (%)
45%18%
AWP kills on a map
326.5798
AWP damage (avg/round)
80.121.6
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
10030
Flash duration on a map (sec)
02:37s00:39s
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
11130
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
100%
Vertigo
56%
Inferno
50%
Dust II
44%
Ancient
24%
Nuke
9%
Overpass
3%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
46
Vertigo
56%
25
5
Inferno
50%
16
16
Dust II
56%
18
19
Ancient
74%
19
4
Nuke
76%
25
2
Overpass
57%
7
23
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
1
2
Vertigo
0%
0
7
Inferno
100%
5
0
Dust II
100%
3
2
Ancient
50%
2
5
Nuke
67%
3
4
Overpass
60%
5
0
Info
Match analysis of SAW vs 500 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between SAW and 500, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by 500. The MVP of this match was Patrick.
500 analytics
The team 500 secured 19 out of 36 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 1 bombs during the match.
The standout players for 500 were Patrick contributed 31 kills and dennyslaw contributed 34 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 13972 overall damage.
On the defensive side, 500 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
SAW analytics
The team SAW managed to secure 17 out of 36 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for SAW were JUST contributed 29 kills and story contributed 24 kills. 13005 of total damage by SAW could not prevent 500 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, SAW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments