500 Scoreboard Ancient (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

19

7

9

+12

123

3:0

5

1

9.2

+43%

17

8

2

+9

86

0:1

5

1

7.9

+26%

15

12

4

+3

104

2:3

4

1

7.4

+38%

12

10

6

+2

82

2:3

2

1

6.9

+4%

8

9

4

-1

55

0:2

3

0

5.2

-12%

Total

71

46

25

+25

450

7:9

19

4

7.3

+20%

SAW Scoreboard Ancient (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

12

14

6

-2

101

4:2

3

0

6.5

+9%

11

14

1

-3

76

2:1

3

0

5.9

-5%

11

14

1

-3

77

1:1

1

0

5.6

-12%

6

15

4

-9

55

1:1

2

0

4.5

-39%

5

14

1

-9

41

1:2

1

0

3.7

-41%

Total

45

71

13

-26

350

9:7

10

0

5.2

-18%

Teams advantage Ancient (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of 500 vs SAW by the Bo3.gg Team

500 on Ancient Analysis

500 demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 13 out of 16 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for 500 on Ancient were SHiPZ, who contributed 19 kills, and Rainwaker, who added 17 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 7192 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Ancient, 500 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


SAW on Ancient Analysis

Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for SAW, as they managed to secure 3 out of 16 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for SAW on Ancient included MUTiRiS, who contributed 12 kills, and rmn, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5602 total damage, SAW couldn't prevent 500 from securing victory on Ancient


On the defensive side of Ancient, SAW struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date