0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Starter
Lineup
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
100%
Inferno
71%
Overpass
60%
Nuke
45%
Vertigo
44%
Dust II
30%
Ancient
22%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
1
1
Inferno
100%
1
0
Overpass
0%
0
1
Nuke
100%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Dust II
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
1
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
9
Inferno
29%
7
6
Overpass
60%
5
6
Nuke
55%
11
0
Vertigo
44%
18
2
Dust II
30%
10
6
Ancient
22%
9
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
Info
Match analysis of Sao Caetano vs Stars Horizon by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Sao Caetano and Stars Horizon, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Nuke, and victory was secured by Sao Caetano. The MVP of this match was zqk.
Sao Caetano analytics
The team Sao Caetano secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Sao Caetano were zqk contributed 42 kills and SHOOWTiME contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 12973 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Sao Caetano held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Stars Horizon analytics
The team Stars Horizon managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Stars Horizon were hoax contributed 26 kills and supLexN1 contributed 23 kills. 12719 of total damage by Stars Horizon could not prevent Sao Caetano from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Stars Horizon struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments