0 Comments
Teams advantage Nuke (M1)
Records Nuke
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
100%
Inferno
71%
Overpass
60%
Nuke
45%
Vertigo
44%
Dust II
30%
Ancient
22%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
100%
1
1
Inferno
100%
1
0
Overpass
0%
0
1
Nuke
100%
1
0
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Dust II
0%
1
0
Ancient
0%
0
1
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
9
Inferno
29%
7
6
Overpass
60%
5
6
Nuke
55%
11
0
Vertigo
44%
18
2
Dust II
30%
10
6
Ancient
22%
9
1
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
Info
Map Analysis of Sao Caetano vs Stars Horizon by the Bo3.gg Team
Sao Caetano on Nuke Analysis
Sao Caetano demonstrated their prowers on Nuke, securing 19 out of 34 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Sao Caetano on Nuke were zqk, who contributed 42 kills, and SHOOWTiME, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Nuke, the team inflicted a total of 12973 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Nuke, Sao Caetano held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Stars Horizon on Nuke Analysis
Nuke proved to be a challenging battleground for Stars Horizon, as they managed to secure 15 out of 34 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Stars Horizon on Nuke included hoax, who contributed 26 kills, and supLexN1, who added 23 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 12719 total damage, Stars Horizon couldn't prevent Sao Caetano from securing victory on Nuke
On the defensive side of Nuke, Stars Horizon struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 11 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments