Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:35s01:26s
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
124
USP kills on a map
51.6074
USP damage (avg/round)
26.84.7
M4A1 kills on a map
104.491
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
53.216.3
Damage (total/round)
39773
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
42701011
Player score (round)
38811011
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
60%
Nuke
58%
Dust II
50%
Vertigo
S
18%
Mirage
S
17%
Anubis
S
7%
Inferno
0%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
60%
35
0
Nuke
58%
26
2
Dust II
50%
4
3
Vertigo
42%
12
12
Mirage
50%
12
15
Anubis
43%
21
5
Inferno
0%
0
32
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
3
7
Nuke
0%
3
3
Dust II
0%
1
0
Vertigo
60%
5
1
Mirage
67%
6
0
Anubis
50%
8
0
Inferno
0%
0
6
Info
Match analysis of RUBY vs System5 by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between RUBY and System5, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-2, on the following maps: Mirage, Anubis, Nuke, and victory was secured by System5. The MVP of this match was Chill.
System5 analytics
The team System5 secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for System5 were Chill contributed 70 kills and Python contributed 50 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 25768 overall damage.
On the defensive side, System5 held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
RUBY analytics
The team RUBY managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for RUBY were sowalio contributed 48 kills and w1nt3r contributed 40 kills. 23214 of total damage by RUBY could not prevent System5 from securing the victory
On the defensive side, RUBY struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments