0 Comments
Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:27s01:24s
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
44.416.3
AK47 kills on a map
116.4203
AK47 damage (avg/round)
62.825.2
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3011
Smoke thrown on a map
1614.3232
USP damage (avg/round)
16.34.8
AK47 kills on a map
116.4203
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4516
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
144.2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
76%
Ancient
58%
Dust II
20%
Inferno
15%
Anubis
11%
Nuke
7%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
76%
17
5
Ancient
0%
0
38
Dust II
20%
5
16
Inferno
42%
12
10
Anubis
44%
18
2
Nuke
36%
14
6
Vertigo
60%
10
14
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
20
Ancient
58%
12
0
Dust II
0%
0
9
Inferno
27%
11
5
Anubis
33%
6
8
Nuke
29%
7
11
Vertigo
60%
5
5
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Rooster vs KZG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Rooster and KZG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by KZG. The MVP of this match was Samuukxs.
KZG analytics
The team KZG secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for KZG were Samuukxs contributed 20 kills and Hassie contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7410 overall damage.
On the defensive side, KZG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Rooster analytics
The team Rooster managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Rooster were Rackem contributed 15 kills and asap contributed 9 kills. 5683 of total damage by Rooster could not prevent KZG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Rooster struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments