0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:27s01:24s
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
44.416.3
AK47 kills on a map
116.4203
AK47 damage (avg/round)
62.825.2
Tec-9 kills on a map
21.3011
Smoke thrown on a map
1614.3232
USP damage (avg/round)
16.34.8
AK47 kills on a map
116.4203
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4516
GLOCK damage (avg/round)
144.2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Mirage
76%
Ancient
58%
Dust II
20%
Inferno
15%
Anubis
11%
Nuke
7%
Vertigo
0%
Last 5 maps
Mirage
76%
17
5
Ancient
0%
0
38
Dust II
20%
5
16
Inferno
42%
12
10
Anubis
44%
18
2
Nuke
36%
14
6
Vertigo
60%
10
14
Last 5 maps
Mirage
0%
0
20
Ancient
58%
12
0
Dust II
0%
0
9
Inferno
27%
11
5
Anubis
33%
6
8
Nuke
29%
7
11
Vertigo
60%
5
5
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Rooster vs KZG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Rooster and KZG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by KZG. The MVP of this match was Samuukxs.
KZG analytics
The team KZG secured 13 out of 17 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 5 bombs during the match.
The standout players for KZG were Samuukxs contributed 20 kills and Hassie contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7410 overall damage.
On the defensive side, KZG held their ground firmly, successfully defending 5 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Rooster analytics
The team Rooster managed to secure 4 out of 17 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Rooster were Rackem contributed 15 kills and asap contributed 9 kills. 5683 of total damage by Rooster could not prevent KZG from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Rooster struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments