0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Percentage of headshots
39%15%
Smoke thrown on a map
1914.6931
Shots accuracy (%)
39%18%
Molotov kills on a map
21.0811
M4A1 kills on a map
164.491
M4A1 damage (avg/round)
65.916.3
Smoke thrown on a map
2214.6931
HE damage (avg/round)
12.73.4
USP kills on a map
51.6074
USP damage (avg/round)
24.34.7
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Ancient
70%
Inferno
55%
Nuke
50%
Mirage
40%
Vertigo
33%
Anubis
32%
Last 5 maps
Ancient
0%
0
41
Inferno
55%
11
12
Nuke
50%
10
12
Mirage
40%
5
11
Vertigo
50%
18
10
Anubis
61%
23
5
Last 5 maps
Ancient
70%
10
1
Inferno
0%
3
9
Nuke
0%
6
15
Mirage
0%
0
25
Vertigo
17%
6
5
Anubis
29%
7
13
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of Rooster vs KZG by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Rooster and KZG, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Rooster. The MVP of this match was nettik.
Rooster analytics
The team Rooster secured 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Rooster were nettik contributed 15 kills and dangeR contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7903 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Rooster held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
KZG analytics
The team KZG managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 2 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for KZG were KZXL contributed 14 kills and Mingovi contributed 13 kills. 6230 of total damage by KZG could not prevent Rooster from securing the victory
On the defensive side, KZG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments