Teams advantage
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:31s01:25s
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:31s01:25s
USP kills on a map
61.6027
USP damage (avg/round)
23.24.8
Eco wins full buy
1
Damage (total/round)
47073
Player score (round)
44091010
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
35691010
Player's aces
1
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
73%
Dust II
36%
Vertigo
31%
Mirage
4%
Anubis
4%
Nuke
3%
Ancient
1%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
0
21
Dust II
44%
9
8
Vertigo
71%
17
1
Mirage
54%
28
5
Anubis
69%
29
2
Nuke
50%
22
5
Ancient
59%
27
1
Last 5 maps
Inferno
73%
15
3
Dust II
80%
10
10
Vertigo
40%
5
17
Mirage
50%
2
22
Anubis
65%
31
1
Nuke
47%
15
0
Ancient
60%
20
1
Info
Match analysis of Revenant vs FAVBET by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Revenant and FAVBET, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 2-0, on the following maps: Mirage, Nuke, and victory was secured by Revenant. The MVP of this match was lauNX.
Revenant analytics
The team Revenant secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Mirage, Nuke. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Revenant were lauNX contributed 38 kills and Nivera contributed 38 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16703 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Revenant held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
FAVBET analytics
The team FAVBET managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for FAVBET were j3kie contributed 38 kills and t3ns1on contributed 29 kills. 16289 of total damage by FAVBET could not prevent Revenant from securing the victory
On the defensive side, FAVBET struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments