0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Deagle kills on a map
71.6964
Shots (total/round)
9216
Damage (total/round)
39073
Player score (round)
38421012
Player score (round)
35521012
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Teammate kills
1
Flash duration on a round (sec)
00:17s00:05s
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
100%
Dust II
0%
Overpass
0%
Vertigo
0%
Nuke
0%
Mirage
0%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
1
1
Dust II
0%
0
0
Overpass
0%
0
2
Vertigo
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
1
1
Mirage
0%
0
2
Last 5 maps
Inferno
0%
1
0
Dust II
0%
1
1
Overpass
0%
0
0
Vertigo
0%
0
2
Nuke
0%
0
1
Mirage
0%
0
0
Info
Match analysis of Reece vs Let's Quit by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Reece and Let's Quit, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Inferno, and victory was secured by Reece. The MVP of this match was TiGeR.
Reece analytics
The team Reece secured 21 out of 40 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Reece were TiGeR contributed 36 kills and rage contributed 27 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15697 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Reece held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Let's Quit analytics
The team Let's Quit managed to secure 19 out of 40 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 1 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Let's Quit were QKA contributed 36 kills and DG contributed 29 kills. 14066 of total damage by Let's Quit could not prevent Reece from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Let's Quit struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments