0 Comments
69
88
17
-19
340
11:13
15
0
Dust II5.5
-1%
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Lineups
Lineup
- Starter
- Starter
Lineup
- Starter
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
55%
Vertigo
50%
Dust II
30%
Overpass
25%
Ancient
25%
Mirage
14%
Inferno
6%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
2
Vertigo
0%
1
3
Dust II
80%
5
0
Overpass
38%
8
1
Ancient
25%
8
1
Mirage
50%
2
0
Inferno
50%
4
2
Last 5 maps
Nuke
55%
11
3
Vertigo
50%
4
9
Dust II
50%
10
0
Overpass
13%
8
4
Ancient
0%
2
12
Mirage
64%
22
0
Inferno
44%
16
4
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlll
- llwlw
Info
Match analysis of premghouls vs Budapest Five by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between premghouls and Budapest Five, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-1, on the following maps: Dust II, and victory was secured by Budapest Five. The MVP of this match was keen.
Budapest Five analytics
The team Budapest Five secured 24 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Dust II. They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Budapest Five were keen contributed 22 kills and Chill contributed 21 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 9290 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Budapest Five held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
premghouls analytics
The team premghouls managed to secure 0 out of 24 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for premghouls were SRven contributed 19 kills and keegaN contributed 16 kills. 8156 of total damage by premghouls could not prevent Budapest Five from securing the victory
On the defensive side, premghouls struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments