0 Comments
69
88
17
-19
340
11:13
15
0
-1%
Teams advantage Dust II (M1)
Lineups
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
55%
Vertigo
50%
Dust II
30%
Overpass
25%
Ancient
25%
Mirage
14%
Inferno
6%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
2
Vertigo
0%
1
3
Dust II
80%
5
0
Overpass
38%
8
1
Ancient
25%
8
1
Mirage
50%
2
0
Inferno
50%
4
2
Last 5 maps
Nuke
55%
11
3
Vertigo
50%
4
9
Dust II
50%
10
0
Overpass
13%
8
4
Ancient
0%
2
12
Mirage
64%
22
0
Inferno
44%
16
4
Last results
Head to head
Past matches
- lwlll
- llwlw
Info
Map Analysis of premghouls vs Budapest Five by the Bo3.gg Team
Budapest Five on Dust II Analysis
Budapest Five demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 24 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for Budapest Five on Dust II were keen, who contributed 22 kills, and Chill, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 9290 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, Budapest Five held their ground firmly, successfully defending 15 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
premghouls on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for premghouls, as they managed to secure 0 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for premghouls on Dust II included SRven, who contributed 19 kills, and keegaN, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8156 total damage, premghouls couldn't prevent Budapest Five from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, premghouls struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments