0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Deagle kills on a map
51.6672
GLOCK kills on a map
41.4456
Damage (total/round)
39873
Player score (round)
35781011
Player score (round)
37011011
Player score (round)
34871011
Player score (round)
35201011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Clutch (opponents)
2
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Inferno
56%
Nuke
56%
Vertigo
45%
Mirage
19%
Ancient
15%
Anubis
15%
Overpass
11%
Last 5 maps
Inferno
100%
1
60
Nuke
56%
45
5
Vertigo
55%
33
18
Mirage
59%
39
12
Ancient
75%
52
16
Anubis
53%
36
20
Overpass
54%
48
9
Last 5 maps
Inferno
44%
9
1
Nuke
0%
0
1
Vertigo
100%
3
1
Mirage
40%
10
0
Ancient
60%
5
2
Anubis
38%
8
4
Overpass
43%
7
2
Info
Match analysis of Permitta vs DMS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Permitta and DMS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 1-0, on the following maps: Anubis, and victory was secured by Permitta. The MVP of this match was H1te.
Permitta analytics
The team Permitta secured 13 out of 21 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Anubis. They also successfully set 3 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Permitta were maaryy contributed 19 kills and mASKED contributed 18 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 7732 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Permitta held their ground firmly, successfully defending 6 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
DMS analytics
The team DMS managed to secure 8 out of 21 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 3 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for DMS were H1te contributed 22 kills and sm3t contributed 13 kills. 7849 of total damage by DMS could not prevent Permitta from securing the victory
On the defensive side, DMS struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 2 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments