0 Comments
76
83
23
-7
352
9:15
18
1
0%
83
76
26
+7
374
15:9
21
1
+5%
Teams advantage Dust II (M2)
Records Dust II
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
Fast bomb plant (sec)
00:23s01:24s
M4A4 kills on a map
103.3832
M4A4 damage (avg/round)
3811.8
USP kills on a map
41.5986
USP damage (avg/round)
16.54.8
Flash blinded on a map (opp)
6228
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
35521010
Damage (total/round)
46073
Player score (round)
40741010
Info
Map Analysis of Patins da Ferrari vs JOGA DE TERNO by the Bo3.gg Team
JOGA DE TERNO on Dust II Analysis
JOGA DE TERNO demonstrated their prowers on Dust II, securing 13 out of 24 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.
The standout players for JOGA DE TERNO on Dust II were BALEROSTYLE, who contributed 20 kills, and Sakamoto, who added 20 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Dust II, the team inflicted a total of 8965 overall damage.
On the defensive side of Dust II, JOGA DE TERNO held their ground firmly, successfully defending 8 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.
Patins da Ferrari on Dust II Analysis
Dust II proved to be a challenging battleground for Patins da Ferrari, as they managed to secure 11 out of 24 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.
The standout players for Patins da Ferrari on Dust II included lub, who contributed 21 kills, and land1n, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 8452 total damage, Patins da Ferrari couldn't prevent JOGA DE TERNO from securing victory on Dust II
On the defensive side of Dust II, Patins da Ferrari struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments