paiN Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

21

9

9

+12

120

3:2

6

0

8.4

+47%

16

7

5

+9

92

1:1

3

0

7.3

+33%

17

9

3

+8

99

1:2

4

0

7.0

+29%

13

9

3

+4

66

1:0

3

0

6.0

+5%

11

12

7

-1

84

2:5

2

0

5.7

-3%

Total

78

46

27

+32

459

8:10

18

0

6.9

+22%

Bounty Hunters Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

11

14

0

-3

63

4:1

3

1

6.0

-10%

11

17

2

-6

69

3:2

0

0

5.8

-27%

11

17

4

-6

66

2:1

3

0

5.6

-15%

8

14

2

-6

58

0:2

1

1

5.0

-28%

5

16

5

-11

46

1:2

0

0

4.1

-36%

Total

46

78

13

-32

302

10:8

7

2

5.3

-23%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of paiN vs Bounty Hunters by the Bo3.gg Team

paiN on Anubis Analysis

paiN demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for paiN on Anubis were nqz, who contributed 21 kills, and kauez, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 8270 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, paiN held their ground firmly, successfully defending 7 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


Bounty Hunters on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for Bounty Hunters, as they managed to secure 5 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for Bounty Hunters on Anubis included bnc, who contributed 11 kills, and piriajr, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5440 total damage, Bounty Hunters couldn't prevent paiN from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, Bounty Hunters struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date