OG Scoreboard Ancient (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

11

16

1

-5

79

2:1

2

0

6.2

-17%

11

18

2

-7

63

1:3

3

0

4.9

-22%

10

16

3

-6

60

0:3

3

0

4.9

-21%

8

17

2

-9

58

1:2

1

0

4.8

-28%

8

16

1

-8

54

2:3

1

0

4.7

-29%

Total

48

83

9

-35

314

6:12

10

0

5.1

-23%

SAW Scoreboard Ancient (M0)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

MVP

20

6

5

+14

111

1:1

6

3

8.6

+63%

22

9

2

+13

106

7:2

7

0

8.4

+42%

16

9

5

+7

101

2:2

3

0

7.1

+32%

16

10

4

+6

89

1:0

4

0

6.8

+24%

9

14

7

-5

72

1:1

2

1

5.4

-16%

Total

83

48

23

+35

478

12:6

22

4

7.3

+29%

Teams advantage Ancient (M0)
Info
Map Analysis of OG vs SAW by the Bo3.gg Team

SAW on Ancient Analysis

SAW demonstrated their prowers on Ancient, securing 16 out of 18 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for SAW on Ancient were rmn, who contributed 20 kills, and story, who added 22 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Ancient, the team inflicted a total of 8612 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Ancient, SAW held their ground firmly, successfully defending 13 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


OG on Ancient Analysis

Ancient proved to be a challenging battleground for OG, as they managed to secure 2 out of 18 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for OG on Ancient included regali, who contributed 11 kills, and FASHR, who added 11 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 5649 total damage, OG couldn't prevent SAW from securing victory on Ancient


On the defensive side of Ancient, OG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date