OG Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

16

15

6

+1

85

2:1

3

0

6.6

+9%

16

16

2

0

81

2:3

3

0

6.1

+10%

13

18

4

-5

66

3:4

3

0

5.3

-11%

10

17

0

-7

62

1:2

1

0

5.2

-22%

8

14

5

-6

56

1:1

1

0

5.0

-25%

Total

63

80

17

-17

350

9:11

11

0

5.7

-8%

fnatic Scoreboard Inferno (M1)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

25

14

5

+11

107

2:1

8

1

8.6

+32%

21

11

7

+10

106

5:2

4

0

8.4

+18%

14

11

4

+3

65

1:1

2

1

6.5

+3%

11

16

10

-5

82

3:3

2

0

6.1

-6%

9

11

7

-2

66

0:2

2

0

5.3

-8%

Total

80

63

33

+17

426

11:9

18

2

7.0

+8%

Teams advantage Inferno (M1)
Info
Map Analysis of OG vs fnatic by the Bo3.gg Team

fnatic on Inferno Analysis

fnatic demonstrated their prowers on Inferno, securing 13 out of 20 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for fnatic on Inferno were MATYS, who contributed 25 kills, and blameF, who added 21 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Inferno, the team inflicted a total of 8525 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Inferno, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


OG on Inferno Analysis

Inferno proved to be a challenging battleground for OG, as they managed to secure 7 out of 20 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for OG on Inferno included Chr1zN, who contributed 16 kills, and Nexius, who added 16 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 6998 total damage, OG couldn't prevent fnatic from securing victory on Inferno


On the defensive side of Inferno, OG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 3 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date