OG Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

9

14

3

-5

79

0:0

3

0

5.7

-10%

10

13

2

-3

83

0:3

3

0

5.4

-5%

5

14

1

-9

49

1:5

1

0

4.0

-38%

6

13

4

-7

45

0:4

2

0

4.0

-36%

1

14

1

-13

19

0:1

0

0

3.1

-75%

Total

31

68

11

-37

274

1:13

9

0

4.4

-33%

fnatic Scoreboard Anubis (M2)

+/-

ROUNDS SCORES

18

6

3

+12

112

3:0

4

0

8.7

+37%

16

7

3

+9

118

2:0

3

1

8.4

+55%

13

6

4

+7

96

3:0

3

0

7.2

+26%

11

7

2

+4

81

3:0

3

0

7.0

+17%

10

5

7

+5

84

2:1

3

0

6.7

+25%

Total

68

31

19

+37

489

13:1

16

1

7.6

+32%

Teams advantage Anubis (M2)
Info
Map Analysis of OG vs fnatic by the Bo3.gg Team

fnatic on Anubis Analysis

fnatic demonstrated their prowers on Anubis, securing 13 out of 14 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations on this specific map. Victory on this map contributed to their overall success in the match.


The standout players for fnatic on Anubis were blameF, who contributed 18 kills, and KRIMZ, who added 16 kills to the team's efforts. Their exceptional skills and coordination were instrumental in securing the map win. Throughout the match on Anubis, the team inflicted a total of 6853 overall damage.


On the defensive side of Anubis, fnatic held their ground firmly, successfully defending 12 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control on this map proved to be crucial in their victory.


OG on Anubis Analysis

Anubis proved to be a challenging battleground for OG, as they managed to secure 1 out of 14 rounds on this map. Adapting to their opponent's strategies on this particular map presented difficulties for them.


The standout players for OG on Anubis included F1KU, who contributed 9 kills, and Buzz, who added 10 kills. Despite their individual efforts, inflicting 3835 total damage, OG couldn't prevent fnatic from securing victory on Anubis


On the defensive side of Anubis, OG struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 1 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges on this map, making it difficult to maintain site control.

Comments
By date