0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
31.4456
Deagle kills on a map
51.6672
Speed Round (sec)
00:19s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
40073
Player score (round)
49381011
Player score (round)
35151011
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Dust II
50%
Nuke
47%
Inferno
20%
Anubis
13%
Vertigo
7%
Mirage
5%
Ancient
5%
Last 5 maps
Dust II
0%
0
0
Nuke
0%
1
10
Inferno
38%
8
2
Anubis
53%
19
1
Vertigo
20%
10
3
Mirage
55%
22
0
Ancient
41%
27
0
Last 5 maps
Dust II
50%
2
0
Nuke
47%
15
4
Inferno
58%
12
3
Anubis
40%
20
6
Vertigo
27%
11
4
Mirage
50%
2
18
Ancient
46%
39
2
Last results
Head to head
Info
Match analysis of NOM vs Viperio by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between NOM and Viperio, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Inferno, Ancient, and victory was secured by Viperio. The MVP of this match was upE.
Viperio analytics
The team Viperio secured 26 out of 39 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps Inferno, Ancient. They also successfully set 2 bombs during the match.
The standout players for Viperio were upE contributed 33 kills and mAnGo contributed 29 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 15318 overall damage.
On the defensive side, Viperio held their ground firmly, successfully defending 14 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
NOM analytics
The team NOM managed to secure 13 out of 39 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 5 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for NOM were eku contributed 34 kills and dan1 contributed 22 kills. 13022 of total damage by NOM could not prevent Viperio from securing the victory
On the defensive side, NOM struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 4 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments