0 Comments
Records Match
Record/Time/Map
Val/Avg
Set by
Rival
GLOCK kills on a map
01
AK47 kills on a map
07
Galil kills on a map
02
Speed Round (sec)
00:34s01:55s
Speed Round (sec)
00:28s01:55s
Damage (total/round)
41873
Player score (round)
43291011
Player's aces
1
Player score (round)
36281011
Multikill x-
4
Historical Maps winrate Last 6 months
Nuke
54%
Dust II
46%
Mirage
30%
Ancient
28%
Anubis
27%
Inferno
25%
Vertigo
25%
Last 5 maps
Nuke
54%
13
10
Dust II
100%
1
5
Mirage
83%
6
22
Ancient
69%
39
1
Anubis
60%
25
4
Inferno
75%
12
9
Vertigo
75%
16
4
Last 5 maps
Nuke
0%
0
10
Dust II
54%
13
0
Mirage
53%
19
0
Ancient
41%
17
5
Anubis
33%
9
12
Inferno
50%
18
1
Vertigo
50%
10
3
Info
Match analysis of Nemiga vs DMS by the Bo3.gg Team
In the CS2 match between Nemiga and DMS, a series of thrilling battles unfolded with a score of 0-2, on the following maps: Anubis, Mirage, and victory was secured by DMS. The MVP of this match was AW.
DMS analytics
The team DMS secured 0 out of 0 rounds, showcasing their ability to control and adapt to various situations. They won on the maps . They also successfully set 0 bombs during the match.
The standout players for DMS were AW contributed 37 kills and sFade8 contributed 34 kills. Their exceptional skills played a pivotal role in securing the win. Thanks to coordinated effort, the team inflicted 16351 overall damage.
On the defensive side, DMS held their ground firmly, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination and site control proved to be crucial.
Nemiga analytics
The team Nemiga managed to secure 0 out of 0 rounds, but faced challenges in adapting to their opponent's strategies. Capturing 0 plants during the match did not lead the team to victory.
The standout players for Nemiga were Xant3r contributed 28 kills and riskyb0b contributed 26 kills. 13678 of total damage by Nemiga could not prevent DMS from securing the victory
On the defensive side, Nemiga struggled to hold their ground, successfully defending 0 bomb plants. Their defensive coordination faced challenges, making it difficult to maintain site control.
0 Comments